Delhi
court on Saturday reserved its order for 4th February on Janata Party
chief Subramanian Swamy's plea seeking prosecution of Union Home
Minister P Chidambaram in the 2G scam case.
"Put
up for orders on February 4," Special CBI judge O P Saini said after
Swamy concluded his arguments in support of his allegations against
Chidambaram.
During
the arguments, Swamy said the evidence he had brought on court's record
prima facie show that Chidambaram is equally culpable as former Telecom
Minister A Raja, who is facing trial in the 2G spectrum allocation
scam.
"A
Raja and P Chidambaram had committed the offence together. Prima facie
Chidambaram had conspired and colluded with Raja to commit offence of
criminal misconduct," he said.
He
told the court that the evidence which he had bought before it was
sufficient to show that Chidambaram, as the then finance minister, has
prima facie committed offences under Prevention of Corruption Act and
other criminal laws.
"It
is clear that at this stage all I need to do is to show that evidence
brought on record is sufficient to show that Chidambaram, at present not
an accused in the case, has prima facie committed offences under the
Prevention of Corruption Act and other criminal laws," Swamy contended.
Referring to the court's order of 22nd
October on framing of charges in the case, Swamy said that offloading
of shares by Swan Telecom and Unitech Wireless to foreign-based Etisalat
and Telenor respectively was only a "trick".
"I
can lean on the pillars that the court has provided by its order on
framing of charges. The share dilution was only a trick because it
permitted licences to be transferred," Swamy said.
He
also contended that being the then finance minister, Chidambaram, along
with Raja, was empowered by October 2003 cabinet decision to discuss on
and finalise spectrum prices.
"Since
he (Chidambaram) had colluded, conspired and consented with Raja, he
did not call for a cabinet meeting although the officers (of Ministry of
Finance) had kept Chidambaram apprised of the whole thing," Swamy
argued.
On
7th January, Swamy had completed recording of his statement and had
deposed that Chidambaram was also "guilty of breach of trust of national
security" as he had not disclosed that Etisalat and Telenor, to which
Swan Telecom and Unitech Wireless had diluted their shares, were
blacklisted.
Swamy
had told the court that the certified documents showed that Chidambaram
was in "connivance" and "collusion" with Raja on fixing the price of
spectrum licence and permitting two companies Swan Telecom and Unitech
Wireless, which received the licences, in dilution of shares even before
roll out of their services.
Swamy had placed on record certified copies of the minutes of a meeting on January 30, 2008
between Chidambaram and Raja and also the minutes of another meeting
between Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and the two ministers.
Besides
these, he submitted a certified copy of a January 15, 2008 letter
written to the Prime Minister by Chidambaram, a December 21, 2010
communication to him from the Prime Minister's office and the
controversial March 25, 2011 Office Memo of the Finance Ministry to PMO.
Comments
Post a Comment