Sexual harassment at Workplace Bill passed by Parliament
Parliament passed a
bill under which cases of sexual harassment at workplace, including
against domestic help, will have to be disposed of by in-house
committees within a period of 90 days failing which penalty of Rs 50,000
would be imposed.
Repeated
non-compliance of the provisions of the Sexual Harassment of Women at
Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Bill, can lead to
higher penalties and even cancellation of licence or registration to
conduct business.
The
Bill, which has already been passed by Lok Sabha, was unanimously
passed by Rajya Sabha on Tuesday, with Women and Child Development
Minister Krishna Tirath promising to follow up the legislation with
strict rules for its implementation.
The bill brings in its ambit even domestic workers and agriculture labour, both organised and unorganised sectors.
As
per the Act, sexual harassment includes any one or more of unwelcome
acts or behaviour like physical contact and advances, a demand or
request for sexual favours or making sexually coloured remarks or
showing pornography.
The
acts or behaviour whether directly, or by implication, include any
other unwelcome physical, verbal or non-verbal conduct of sexual nature.
Non-compliance
with the provisions of the Act shall be punishable with a fine of up to
Rs. 50,000. It has also provisions for safeguard against false or
malicious charges.
The
Bill makes it mandatory that all offices, hospitals, institutions and
other workplaces should have an internal redressal mechanism for
complaints related to sexual harassment.
The
Act defines domestic worker as a woman employed to do household work in
any household for remuneration whether in cash or kind, either directly
or through any agency on temporary, permanent, part time or full time
basis, but does not include any member of the family of the employer.
A
Parliamentary Standing Committee, which had examined the Bill, had held
the firm view that preventive aspects reflected in it has to be
strictly in line with the Supreme Court guidelines in the 1997 Vishaka
case.
The
apex court's judgement in the case not only defines sexual harassment
at workplace but also lays down guidelines for its prevention and
disciplinary action.
Comments
Post a Comment